Table 1

Logistic regression models for 2c–3 and 2b-3 reperfusion following one or two failed passes

First pass strategyStent retrieverContact aspirationCombined
Second pass outcome (eTICI)2c–32b–32c–32b–32c–32b–3
StrategyaOR (95% CI)P valueaOR (95% CI)P valueaOR (95% CI)P valueaOR (95% CI)P valueaOR (95% CI)P valueaOR (95% CI)P value
 Stent retriever1.9 (0.6 to 6.3)0.2723.9 (0.8 to 18.0)0.0801.3 (0.5 to 3.7)0.5791.0 (0.3 to 3.5)0.951
 Contact aspiration0.5 (0.2 to 1.3)0.1420.3 (0.1 to 0.9) 0.028 0.4 (0.2 to 1.0)0.0640.5 (0.2 to 1.1)0.072
 Combined1.1 (0.7 to 1.9)0.6200.9 (0.5 to 1.6)0.7672.9 (1.6 to 5.5) <0.001 3.3 (1.7 to 6.3) <0.001
Two first passes strategy2 x Stent retriever2 x Contact aspiration2 x Combined
Third pass outcome (eTICI)2c–32b–32c–32b–32c–32b–3
StrategyaOR (95% CI)P valueaOR (95% CI)P valueaOR (95% CI)P valueaOR (95% CI)P valueaOR (95% CI)P valueaOR (95% CI)P value
 Stent retriever0.5 (0.1 to 3.2)0.4251.4 (0.2 to 11.7)0.7351.1 (0.3 to 3.7)0.5713.0 (0.3 to 28.7)0.340
 Contact aspiration0.7 (0.2 to 2.9)0.6650.8 (0.3, 2.4)0.6980.3 (0.1 to 0.9) 0.032 0.8 (0.3 to 2.3)0.676
 Combined5.3 (1.9 to 14.6) 0.001 1.8 (0.7, 4.3)0.2102.7 (1.0 to 7.4) 0.048 2.6 (0.8 to 9.0)0.124
  • Models adjusted for age, occlusion location, previous pass eTICI, balloon guide catheter use, and center.

  • eTICI, extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction.